Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 76

Thread: "Among The Truthers", Straus, the Protocols, and the Chutzpah Maneuver

  1. #51
    Unobtanium PatColo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    15,624
    Thanks
    3,935
    Thanked 6,607 Times in 4,200 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by keehah View Post
    However, I've not seen "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" mentioned in a National Newspaper till this book was reviewed.
    What's nice about these here modern internets is, surfers can find free online resources like The SOURCE Of All Truly True Knowledge Itself: Metapedia - which we find here 'splaining the truth about the Protocols:

    The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

    (Redirected from The Protocols of the Elders of Zion)
    The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion http://en.metapedia.org/m/images/thu...-Protocols.png
    Country
    Russia Language First published in Russian, later translated into many languages Genre Politics Publisher Sergei Nilus Publication 1901

    The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
    , also known as Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion or simply The Protocols, is a widely-distributed document, which describes a purported plan for world domination by International Jewry. The document surfaced in Russia, where it is said to have arrived via France and was published by Sergei Nilus during the early 20th century—it has since been translated into numerous other languages and is read widely across the world.

    The document is alleged to have been secret minutes from the First Zionist Congress held at Basel, Switzerland in August 1897. Much brouhaha has been made by organised Jewry and their allies claiming that the document is a "fraud". However, the most famous public figures who have promoted knowledge of it; such as Henry Ford, have stated they are not interested in whether they were authored from a satirical or esoteric perspective, but rather urge a critical review of historical events that have unfolded, held up against the Protocols.

    ...MORE
    and following we read Metapedia's summary of the ....


    Jewish persecution complex

    http://en.metapedia.org/m/images/thu...cute_me_So.png http://en.metapedia.org/m/skins/comm...gnify-clip.png
    A poster showing the hypocracy of the Jewish persecution complex, alluding to the Red Holocaust.


    The Jewish persecution complex is a group evolutionary strategy developed over centuries by the Jewish nation. It serves as a means of attaining a sympathetic historical account of their tribe, contrary to rival groups and to reap financial benefits on that basis. When it has suited them, the Jews have claimed to have been "persecuted" unjustly, by just about every single nation they have ever dwelled amongst. The Persians, the Egyptians, the Romans, the Germans and so on. They have perfected the strategy to an art-form, to the extent that they can execute it through the use of a single word to try paralyzing rival groups; "Inquisition", "Crusades", "Holocaust" are common examples.


    The trick of the Jew who is "hunted" and "martyred" never fails to work on the stupid cuckold of an Aryan. It is they who are persecuting us. We are the martyrs' victims.
    FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win"

    "If telling the truth marginalizes you, then that is the place to be. After all, if enough people are willing to be marginalized, then before you know it, society has developed a different center. This is the politics of truth." -- E. Martin Schotz

  2. #52
    Joe King
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by PatColo
    Just so everyone's completely clear then JKing, you don't mean to cast condemnation towards people who are sympathetic to revisionist views regarding the Holohoax Controversy, and you maintain that readers who got that impression from your first several posts in this thread would be mistaken?
    Just to be clear Pat, there was no condemnation towards anyone in my post. Not even towards Book. Everyone's entitled to their own opinion. I condemn acts, not thoughts.

    I just thought it funny what Book posted and tried to point it out, you know, in the same manner as he likes to do. Remember, I learned from him how to do that. lol


    Do you agree that Western governments should cease prosecuting, imprisoning & fining those revisionist-historians who propose/evidence alternative narratives re the holohoax? [Irving, Rudolf, Zundel, Zundel's defense attorney, etc]

    Should Bishop Williamson have to pay the 6,500 euro fine which the German court just upheld, for his holohoax thought-crime?
    I don't support that, no.
    As I said, IMO, people should be free to think/feel however they want. It's only actions that matter.

  3. #53
    Book
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Joe King View Post

    I compared him to Hitler because that's what Book seems to act like on the forum....a little Hitler dictator guy. You know, just like the cariciture of Hitler and his merry band of men goose-stepping down the road...

    Edited to add: Since Book wants to acts like a little Hitler, it's an obvious choice to use the goose steping reference. It also means that I think Book looks funny when he does his thinking...

    I just thought it funny what Book posted and tried to point it out, you know, in the same manner as he likes to do. Remember, I learned from him how to do that. lol

    As I said, IMO, people should be free to think/feel however they want. It's only actions that matter.
    http://www.backseatblogger.com/relig..._symbol002.jpg

    Let's unite the clans Joe King. Yours and mine.

    its time we embrace your purported love and peace and spreading happiness thingie here at GSUS.



    second invitation


  4. #54
    Joe King
    Guest
    Yea Book, I do think you're funny when you do your thinking. Especially when it comes out in words like the one I first responded to. lol
    ...but I don't condemn you for it.

    You obviously supported the guy in question, but apparently didn't really know how he felt. lol

    Book - "He just lost my support"

    lol

  5. #55
    Book
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Book View Post
    http://www.backseatblogger.com/relig..._symbol002.jpg

    Let's unite the clans Joe King. Yours and mine.

    its time we embrace your purported love and peace and spreading happiness thingie here at GSUS.



    second invitation Joe

  6. #56
    Joe King
    Guest
    You're bein' funny again.

    If you're human you're already in my clan. Are you a human being? I had thought all people were.

  7. #57
    Book
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Joe King View Post

    If you're human you're already in my clan.

    http://images.buzznet.com/assets/use...08431239-2.jpg

    Even her?

    you sure seem to badmouth a lot of people who you claim to love

  8. #58
    Joe King
    Guest
    Has she ever harmed another person anywhere on the face of the Earth?
    If no, then yes.


    Book, you must be one of the "special" people if you can equate ones endorsement of the "golden rule" to having badmouthed people.

    BTW, badmouthing would be like what General got banned for. Total potty mouth, that one.

  9. #59
    Book
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Joe King View Post

    Has she ever harmed another person anywhere on the face of the Earth?
    Joe King has never harmed another person anywhere on the face of the Earth!


  10. #60
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4,887
    Thanks
    348
    Thanked 1,018 Times in 735 Posts
    At some point very soon Joe you will have earned my new attitude of you.

    What sociopaths and ruling psychopaths need to realize is that people can take quite a lot to a point. Then what chemists call a phase change can occur. In those humans without a system shattered mind (or this condition heals) this is game changing. Then a person's attitude of a person or system can change and basically it will take a new history of fair play to ever change it back.

    Sociopaths don't understand this because they are defective in this way.

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe King View Post
    Hi. I'd like to take a moment to address your statement here. I hope that's ok.

    I hope you don't think I derailed anything. I made one, one-line post where I thought it funny. Just like Book does to whomever he wants, in any thread he wants, since forever.
    So it's quite obvious that it's ok to do it, right?
    I can think of one difference. Book apoligized. Joe King tossed elementary school level sociopathy at me.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •