Quote Originally Posted by palani View Post
I am afraid they do. Do some research on Harry Truman's actions on and around June 20th, 1948. He passed some acts of congress into pubic law (quasi law because he certainly exceeded his authority) while congress was on a major recess. The acts he signed and which are to this day PRESUMED to be law deal with extending federal judicial areas over the several States using the names of those states.
I guess a child rapist owns the child in his basement because he said so? Is this the reason and logic you use to come to this conclusion? Do i need to 'research' his actions in order to be able to tell if he should own the child in his basement? Im really trying to find the moral principle of this statement. I dont believe you have any.


To compound the problem everyone PRESUMES they are U.S. citizens and by this proclamation the federal government gains control over the actions of those people who should be supporting their individual states. You cannot have any control over anything when you are a subject.

Again, where did you find this rabble? Have you been reading the scribbles of insane lobotomized monkeys again? Why do you persist at doing this? Havent you realized your NEVER going to find any reason or logic in the scribbles of 'Politicians'?

How about you stop analyzing things from a 'legal' (INSANE) perspective and try and apply your own moral code to the world. Is this a crazy idea to you?