Quote Originally Posted by palani View Post
Not precisely. In law there is a concept called 'de facto' and a concept called 'de jure'. If a job needs to be done that is not anyone might step into the office to perform it. This is de facto. The acts of a de facto officer are valid but the job does not come with limited liability. The one who performs the act required has full liability.

When all requirements of the job are met then it is held in a de jure manner. The limit to liability to the office holder is the value of his bond.

You attack de facto office holders by sending your sheriff a writ of quo warranto, commanding he drag in the miscreants body to your court to have his credentials examined. Likely the sheriff will not be aware of his duties and would likely not be de jure himself but .... what are your other options?

Where the concept of de facto and de jure fall through is when the office does not exist. If the office doesn't exist neither de jure nor de facto office holders need apply. Gravity can't hold them. They just float off into space.
Where is the legislation that removed the Constitution for the united States of America?

It is still there.

The defacto gov is a private entity pretending just enough to fool most of the people that it is the real gov.
It operates via contract, deception and trust law.