Pizzagate

[singular_me]

children and under age hunters can now have even more fun.

ps: I dont think criminalizing kids/teens wasnt ethical either though since young prostitutes often have been raped or molested to start with. Unfortunately in this environment, that bill is going to make sure that the worse scenarios happen to teens and kids.

==============================
Beginning on Jan. 1, prostitution by minors will be legal in California. Yes, you read that right.

SB 1322 bars law enforcement from arresting sex workers who are under the age of 18 for soliciting or engaging in prostitution, or loitering with the intent to do so. So teenage girls (and boys) in California will soon be free to have sex in exchange for money without fear of arrest or prosecution.

This terribly destructive legislation was written and passed by the progressive Democrats who control California’s state government with a two-thirds “supermajority.” To their credit, they are sincere in their belief that decriminalizing underage prostitution is good public policy that will help victims of sex trafficking. Unfortunately, the reality is that the legalization of underage prostitution suffers from the fatal defect endemic to progressive-left policymaking: it ignores experience, common sense and most of all human nature — especially its darker side.’

MORE: California Democrats legalize child prostitution
12/29/16
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ca...stom_click=rss

---------------

Press Release - Governor Brown signs SB 1322 declaring "There is no such thing as a child prostitute"
September 26, 2016

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 26, 2016
http://www.clcla.org/node/1338

[Cebu_4_2]

children and under age hunters can now have even more fun.

ps: I dont think criminalizing kids/teens wasnt ethical either though since young prostitutes often have been raped or molested to start with. Unfortunately in this environment, that bill is going to make sure that the worse scenarios happen to teens and kids.

==============================

Didn't happen to read it...

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/fa...01320140SB1322

Amended IN Assembly June 30, 2014
Amended IN Assembly June 17, 2014
Amended IN Senate April 01, 2014

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2013–2014 REGULAR SESSION

Senate Bill No. 1322

Introduced by Senator Hernandez

February 21, 2014

An act to add Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 127670) to Part 2 of Division 107 of, and to repeal the heading of Chapter 8 (formerly commencing with Section 127670) of Part 2 of Division 107 of, the Health and Safety Code, relating to health care.


LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST

SB 1322, as amended, Hernandez. California Health Care Cost and Quality Database.
Existing law establishes health care coverage programs to provide health care to segments of the population meeting specified criteria who are otherwise unable to afford health care coverage and provides for the licensure and regulation of health insurers and health care service plans.
This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to establish a system to provide valid health care performance information that is publicly available and can be used to improve the safety, appropriateness, and medical effectiveness of health care, and to provide care that is safe, medically effective, patient-centered, timely, affordable, and equitable. The bill would require the Secretary of California Health and Human Services to, no later than January 1, 2016, enter into a contract with one or more private, independent, nonprofit organizations to establish and administer the California Health Care Cost and Quality Database. The bill would require the secretary to include specified terms in that contract or contracts, including, among others, that the nonprofit organization or organizations establishing and administering the California Health Care Cost and Quality Database develop methodologies relating to the submission of health care data by health care entities. The bill would require certain health care entities, including health care service plans, to provide specified information to the nonprofit organization or organizations establishing and administering the California Health Care Cost and Quality Database. The bill would require all data disclosures made pursuant to these provisions to comply with all applicable state and federal laws for the protection of the privacy and security of the data and would prohibit the public disclose of any unaggregated, individually identifiable health information. The bill would require the nonprofit organization or organizations establishing and administering the California Health Care Cost and Quality Database to collect receive, process, maintain, and analyze information from specified data sources including, among others, electronic health record systems and disease and chronic condition registries. The bill would require, no later than January 1, 2018, the nonprofit organization or organizations establishing and administering the California Health Care Cost and Quality Database to publicly make available a web-based, searchable database and would require that database to be updated regularly.
This bill would also require the secretary to convene an advisory committee composed of a broad spectrum of health care stakeholders and experts, as specified, to research and recommend strategies for promoting high-quality health care and containing health care costs, and to make recommendations regarding the California Health Care Cost and Quality Database. The bill would require the committee to issue a report to the Legislature and the Governor that examines and addresses specified issues, including, among others, containing the cost of health care services and coverage. The bill would provide that the commission not be convened until the Director of Finance has determined that sufficient private or federal funds have been received and appropriated for that purpose, and that members of the committee not receive a per diem or travel expense reimbursement, or any other expense reimbursement.
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO
Bill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1. The heading of Chapter 8 (formerly commencing with Section 127670) of Part 2 of Division 107 of the Health and Safety Code, as amended by Section 230 of Chapter 183 of the Statutes of 2004, is repealed.
SEC. 2. Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 127670) is added to Part 2 of Division 107 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:
CHAPTER 8. California Health Care Cost and Quality Database

127670. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature to establish a system to provide valid health care performance information that is publicly available and can be used to improve the safety, appropriateness, and medical effectiveness of health care, and to provide care that is patient-centered, timely, affordable, and equitable. It is also the intent of the Legislature to grant access to provider performance information to consumers and purchasers in order for them to understand the potential financial consequences and liabilities and obtain maximum quality and value in health care services.
(b) It is the intent of the Legislature, by making cost and quality data available, to encourage health care service plans, health insurers, and providers to develop innovative approaches, services, and programs that may have the potential to deliver health care that is both cost effective and responsive to the needs of enrollees.

127671. (a) The Secretary of California Health and Human Services shall, no later than January 1, 2016, use a competitive process to contract with one or more private, independent, nonprofit organizations in order to establish and administer the California Health Care Cost and Quality Database. A contract entered into pursuant to this section is exempt from Part 2 (commencing with Section 10100) of Division 2 of the Public Contract Code, and is exempt from review or approval by any division of the Department of General Services.
(b) The secretary shall include as a term in the contract or contracts entered into pursuant to subdivision (a) all of the following:
(1) A requirement that the nonprofit organization or organizations establishing and administering the California Health Care Cost and Quality Database do all of the following:
(A) Develop methodologies for the collection, validation, refinement, analysis, comparison, review, reporting, and improvement of health care data submitted by health care entities that are validated, recognized as reliable, and meet industry and research standards.
(B) Receive information from all types of health care entities and report that information in a form that allows valid comparisons across care delivery systems.
(C) Comply with the requirements governing provider and supplier requests for error correction established pursuant to Section 401.717 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations for all claims data received, including, but not limited to, data from sources other than Medicare.
(2) A prohibition on the nonprofit organization or organizations establishing and administering the California Health Care Cost and Quality Database doing either of the following:
(A) Using the data received during the execution of the contract for any purpose not specified in this chapter or in the contract.
(B) Receiving funding from any other source to accomplish the same purposes sought to be accomplished under this chapter unless funding is received from another nonprofit or government source and is for the purpose of research or education.
(3) A requirement that the nonprofit organization or organizations establishing and administering the California Health Care Cost and Quality Database identify the type of data, purpose of use, and entities and individuals that are required to report to, or that may have access to, the Health Care Cost and Quality Database.
(c) For the purposes implementing the California Health Care Cost and Quality Database, a health care service plan, including a specialized health care service plan, an insurer licensed to provide health insurance, as defined in Section 106 of the Insurance Code, a self-insured employer, or a multiemployer self-insured plan, that is responsible for paying for health care services provided to beneficiaries, the trust administrator for a multiemployer self-insured plan, a supplier, as defined in paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 1367.50, or a provider, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 1367.50, shall provide both of the following to the nonprofit organization or organizations establishing and administering the California Health Care Cost and Quality Database:
(1) Utilization data from insurers’ medical, dental, and pharmacy claims and encounter data from entities that do not use claims data, including, but not limited to, integrated delivery systems.
(2) Pricing information for health care items and services gathered from allowed charges for covered health care items and services or, in the case of organizations that do not use or produce individual claims, standard price lists.
(d) (1)   All disclosures of data made pursuant to this section shall comply with all applicable state and federal laws for the protection of the privacy and security of the data, including, but not limited to, the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-191) and the federal Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, Title XIII of the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-5), and implementing regulations.
(2) (A) All policies and protocols developed in the performance of the contract shall ensure that the privacy, security, and confidentiality of individually identifiable health information is protected. The nonprofit organization or organizations establishing and administering the California Health Care Cost and Quality Database shall not publicly disclose any unaggregated, individually identifiable health information.
(B) For the purposes of this paragraph, “individually identifiable health information” has the same meaning as in Section 160.103 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
(e) (1) The nonprofit organization or organizations establishing and administering the California Health Care Cost and Quality Database shall collect receive, process, maintain, and analyze information from data sources including, but not limited to, claims from private and public payers, electronic health record systems, disease and chronic condition registries, third-party surveys of quality and patient satisfaction, reviews by licensing and accrediting bodies, and local and regional public health data. Aggregated payer and provider performance on validated measures of clinical quality and patient experience, such as measures from the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) and Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), shall be collected from accrediting organizations, including, but not limited, to the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), URAC, and the Joint Commission.
(2) The nonprofit organization or organizations establishing and administering the California Health Care Cost and Quality Database shall include all of the following in an analysis performed pursuant to paragraph (1):
(A) Population-level data on prevention, screening, and wellness utilization.
(B) Population-level data on behavioral and medical risk factors, interventions and outcomes.
(C) Population-level data on chronic conditions, management, and outcomes.
(D) Population-level data on trends in utilization of procedures for treatment of similar conditions to evaluate medical appropriateness.
(E) Data that permits socioeconomic status and disparities in care due to race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, and gender identity to be considered.
(f) No later than January 1, 2018, the nonprofit organization or organizations establishing and administering the California Health Care Cost and Quality Database shall make publicly available a web-based, searchable database. The information shall be presented in a way that facilitates comparisons of cost, quality, and satisfaction across payers, provider organizations, and other suppliers of health care services. This public database shall be regularly updated to reflect new data submissions.

127672. (a) The Secretary of California Health and Human Services shall convene an advisory committee, composed of a broad spectrum of health care stakeholders and experts, including, but not limited to, representatives of the entities that are required to provide information pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 127671 and representatives of purchasers, including, but not limited to, businesses, organized labor, and consumers, to research and recommend appropriate and timely strategies for promoting high-quality health care, containing health care costs, and making recommendations regarding the establishment, implementation, and ongoing administration of the California Health Care Cost and Quality Database, including a business plan for sustainability without using moneys from the General Fund. The advisory committee shall hold public meetings with stakeholders, solicit input, and set its own meeting agendas. Meetings of the advisory committee are subject to the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act (Article 9 (commencing with Section 11120) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code).
(b) The secretary shall arrange for the preparation of a report to the Legislature and the Governor based on the findings of the advisory committee, including input from the public meetings, that shall, at a minimum, examine and address the following issues:
(1) Assessing California health care needs and available resources.
(2) Containing the cost of health care services and coverage.
(3) Improving the quality and medical appropriateness of health care.
(4) Increasing the transparency of health care costs and the relative efficiency with which care is delivered.
(5) Use of disease management, wellness, prevention, and other innovative programs to keep people healthy and reduce disparities and costs and improving health outcomes for all populations.
(6) Efficient utilization of prescription drugs and technology.
(7) Reducing unnecessary, inappropriate, and wasteful health care.
(8) Educating consumers in the use of health care information.
(9) Using existing data sources to build the Health Care Cost and Quality Database.
(c) The advisory committee established pursuant to this section shall not be convened until the Director of Finance has determined that sufficient private or federal funds have been received and that the funds have been appropriated for that purpose.
(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the members of the advisory committee shall receive no per diem or travel expense reimbursement, or any other expense reimbursement.

[PatColo]

The perfect pizza to follow up after some (Satanic) Goat Head Soup

I'm in the SF BA presently, and have half a mind to go into that original Potrero Hill "Goat Hill" location (there's actually 3 SF loc's now, see http://goathill.com ) with my little android spy device, and give it the once-over... while it's still not notorious. I mean, decorations include children's drawings?! Recall:

Just learned nancy pelosi, speaker of the house, owns "Goat Hill Pizza" in san fran. http://goathill.com

Children"s drawrings all over the walls-- special!!

< 1 min
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=veaVQYKREDg

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Pelosi
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Pelosi

I'm sure they're billionaires; without getting bogged down researching them atm... I recall hearing bits in the past re how filthy rich at least Paul P is (IOW, THEY are); and something about a conflict of interest scandal x years ago where Nancy was voting (not abstaining) on (defense?) spending shite which would enrich (their) biz interests... and I don't mean their little pizza shop(s) !?!?

[singular_me]

not same bill, same # but not same matters.
----------

Urge Governor Brown to Sign SB 1322 (Mitchell): There is No Such Thing As a “Child Prostitute”
September 06, 2016
Dear Supporters:

Last week, SB 1322 (Mitchell) passed the Senate Floor 29-9 and landed on the Governor's desk. California is so close to signing SB 1322 into law and affirming that there is no such thing as a "child prostitute." To make this happen, we need to once more demonstrate widespread support for this bill. http://www.clcla.org/node/1338

http://sd30.senate.ca.gov/news/press...-there-no-such

Didn't happen to read it...

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/fa...01320140SB1322

Amended IN Assembly June 30, 2014
Amended IN Assembly June 17, 2014
Amended IN Senate April 01, 2014

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2013–2014 REGULAR SESSION

Senate Bill No. 1322

Introduced by Senator Hernandez

February 21, 2014

An act to add Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 127670) to Part 2 of Division 107 of, and to repeal the heading of Chapter 8 (formerly commencing with Section 127670) of Part 2 of Division 107 of, the Health and Safety Code, relating to health care.

[PatColo]

nothing much new here from DSeaman, if anything reminds me of

[...] He strikes me as naively idealistic about the AG & alphabet agencies investigating & prosecuting pizzagate... Seaman imagining the top levels of those agencies aren't also blackmailable, many of them for participation in the same pizzagate SRA crimes. It's like Seaman believes Pedo-desta is the only sicko, and only understands what he was taught in publik skool civics class.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/KyF8JfgS64Q/h...ACT2Rk_Lg7EDm0
8:24
IN THE WIKILEAKS: U.S. Political Elite In A Satanic Abuse Cult?

• 11,284 views
• 5 hours ago

[PatColo]

OMG, pizza so oily, you need a NAPKIN to hold it, and more... 11 mins:

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ElgMxNupb1s/h...N_oyvPlbwvzMKs

#Pizzagate 2014 Katy Perry Gives 10 Year Old Girl Pizza Pie At Concert While Wearing Pedophile Dress

Victurus Libertas VL

• 1 week ago
• 25,030 views

It's goes even deeper than that. The little girl has a pedo symbol on her shirt and Perry says some very strange things to the 10 ...

This next one started auto-playing after the above vid-- hate YT's auto-play-unless-you-turn-it-off shite in general; but this one caught my attention early, she's plainly onto something. I looked up this book on amzn,

Secret Pizza Party
Sep 3, 2013
by Adam Rubin and Daniel Salmieri

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....6L._UX250_.jpg
^ NYC dinjoo-nuffin adam rubin.


I expect the "racoon/mask" thing is coincident with the masks the elite pedo SRA focks wear at their rituals.

24 mins, I'm still watching:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGHbIs21n9Q



also see (((Rubin's)))

• https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....DL._UX160_.jpg
  $10.99
  Hardcover
• https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....ZL._UX160_.jpg
  $6.94
  Paperback

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....SR272,320_.jpg

Robo-Sauce

[PatColo]

Mayor de Blasio reads ‘Secret Pizza Party’ to Queens kids — and the plot mirrors the fund-raising probe he’s caught up in

http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopo...io1n-2-web.jpg
Mayor de Blasio reads the children's book "Secret Pizza Party" to a group in Queens between Council Majority Leader Jimmy Van Bramer (l.) and Queens Library President Dennis Walcott Saturday at the Woodside branch.

(Kevin C. Downs/for New York Daily News)
BY Dale W. Eisinger Denis Slattery
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Saturday, April 30, 2016, 6:55 PM

When you make something secret, you make it special.

That was the bizarre lesson Mayor de Blasio — whose questionable fund-raising tactics are at the center of an ongoing criminal probe — delivered Saturday to a group of children at a Queens library.

Hizzoner read from the illustrated children’s book “Secret Pizza Party” at the Woodside branch of the Queens Library alongside library boss Dennis Walcott and City Councilman Jimmy Van Bramer.

The poorly chosen yarn follows the exploits of a wily raincoat-clad raccoon who is overly enthusiastic about keeping secrets and stealing pizza.

“When you make something secret, you make it special,” the immoral masked mammal says. “Regular handshake: Boring. Secret handshake: Booyah!”

The eyebrow-raising book could barely keep the attention of the roomful of rambunctious kids, and may have left the mayor with a bad case of indigestion. He didn’t seem to recognize the unintended irony.

http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopo...io1n-1-web.jpg
The poorly chosen book follows the exploits of a wily raincoat-clad raccoon who is overly enthusiastic about keeping secrets and stealing pizza.


“If the raccoon was stealing pizza for a cause he believed in, do you think he was still breaking the law, necessarily?” one reporter asked as the mayor exited the library.

Another used the raccoon’s tale as a jumping off point to grill de Blasio about a Gov. Cuomo ally being probed for potential improper lobbying and undisclosed conflicts of interest involving an upstate power plant.

“What do you think of Joe Percoco’s secret pizza party?” the reporter asked.

De Blasio cracked a smile, but declined to address any pizza or raccoon-related inquiries.

The book, written by Adam Rubin and illustrated by Daniel Salmnieri, has received a mix of reviews online — with some parents questioning the lessons it holds.

http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopo...io1n-3-web.jpg
De Blasio leaves the Woodside branch of the Queens Library without answering any pizza-related inquiries from reporters.

(Kevin C. Downs/for New York Daily News)

“The book was neither fun nor cute,” mom Jen Bee wrote on Amazon. “Yeah, that’s not what I want to teach my child. It sounds like something a pedophile would say to their victim.”

The book is a fun read, according to Yelena Lungin, but she “didn’t like that we were supposed to cheer for the raccoon to steal pizza and get away with it.”

Much like the nocturnal nuisance he read about aloud, De Blasio’s moral compass has been questioned by critics.

The head investigator for the state Board of Elections alleges that the funneling of big money contributions through party committees to Senate candidates was a “willful and flagrant” move made by the mayor to evade contribution limits.

Several of de Blasio’s closest aides and allies were recently smacked with subpoenas by the offices of U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara and Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.

http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopo...io1n-6-web.jpg
Kids raise their hands after the mayor during the reading.

(Kevin C. Downs/for New York Daily News)

On Friday, the mayor said that his fund-raising is only under a microscope because of politics — and ripped the election official who pushed for the probe as clueless.

Speaking on WNYC, he said people should be asking “how a state board of election official singled us out, apparently not understanding how state election law works, and then leaked their document to the media.”

Saturday wasn’t de Blasio’s first pizza-related faux pas.

The mayor caused a stir only a week into his term by using cutlery to chow down on a slice at a Staten Island pizza joint.


http://www.nydailynews.com/news/poli...icle-1.2620104


_______________________


The amzn review mentioned in the article, dated 2/4/15;
https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-r...R1LYFEFD07WKM4
notice it's got a few comments now from PG truthers, one complaining, with even the title given in their complaint apparently auto-removed (& guessing they deliberately misspelled "Pedesto"):

Posted on Dec 27, 2016 10:22:56 AM PST
F. man says:
my post was deleted immediately , probably because the title was
I wonder if the Author knows John Pedesto ?
Reply to this post
Permalink

[PatColo]

Just learned nancy pelosi, speaker of the house, owns "Goat Hill Pizza" in san fran. http://goathill.com

Children"s drawrings all over the walls-- special!!

< 1 min
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=veaVQYKREDg

I just watched this one from that same "...SECRET PIZZA PARTY..." vlogger above, coz this one mentions Goat Hill Pizza. It's between 11:45 & 13:45 in the vid,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJGoGGuHG14


So now wondering if the Pelosis are the owners, of just "connected" to it somehow, or what. Coz vlogger above says Goat Hill has 5 owners, one of whom is named Philip. Then she points to this 2004 CA state pdf doc,

http://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov/statewide-elections/2004-general/list_of_elected_candidates.pdf

wherein we find on page 2, sure enough, Pelosi lists her email contact as philip @ goathill.com....

But guessing the Pelosis (Ped-osis?) aren't listed as 'owners' of the 3-store chain? I'll look it up, both property owners & business owners, after some lunch, and edit this post with that. Tummy growls for fooood now.

[PatColo]

Investigate #Pizzagate

January 1, 2017

At Kyle’s request I have created a gallery with all my #Pizzagate memes. Post them on social media if you will. Sharing is caring, as someone said. Thanks.
http://www.renegadetribune.com/wp-co...gate-Emoji.png http://www.renegadetribune.com/wp-co...ne-602x720.png http://www.renegadetribune.com/wp-co...se-720x720.png http://www.renegadetribune.com/wp-co...ut-530x720.png http://www.renegadetribune.com/wp-co...ta-490x720.jpg http://www.renegadetribune.com/wp-co...ong-Babies.jpg http://www.renegadetribune.com/wp-co.....-565x720.png http://www.renegadetribune.com/wp-co...re-720x432.png http://www.renegadetribune.com/wp-co...ng-515x720.png http://www.renegadetribune.com/wp-co...er-479x720.png

[PatColo]

last 2 images from the above gallery:

http://www.renegadetribune.com/wp-co...DC-720x467.jpg http://www.renegadetribune.com/wp-co...te-720x495.jpg