Re: Mans Court case may have cracked open Fraud of D.C. Federal Jurisdiction
Originally Posted by 7th trump
A 1040 huh?
Then yes hes a bonified under penalty of perjury "US citizen".
Employed or self employed.....both fall under the definition of "employment" as defined in the SS Act.
Just as the court ordered to use the doctors 1040 to prove jurisdiction.............hes a federal second class "US citizen". They know what exactly to use to prove this. I've been saying it the whole time about SS and taxes.
Constitution doesn't give jurisdiction but I haven't seen one district court on state land either. All these buildings are federal buildings on federal land from what I know.
Heres your issue............you believe the district court has illegal jurisdiction in the 50 states. They can and will hear federal issues relating to the district they cover. That doesn't mean they have jurisdiction over the land....they just have jurisdiction to hear federal level arguments covering that area.
Since this doctor is under a federal retirement and welfare program called Social Security and resides in a state he'll be going to that district court to cast his argument.
This isn't going to end well for him because he doesn't understand what he's arguing. And just because the judges are taking their time doesn't mean they are stumped. It took months for the court in Pete Hendricksons case and they convicted him using his signed W4.
It will be interesting to see how this all turns out.
I wonder if all federal courthouses are on federal land. Some Post Offices are leased on privately owned land.
The only thing declared necessary in the Constitution & Bill of Rights is the #2A Militia of the several States.
“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a freeState”