Quote Originally Posted by 7th trump View Post
Sure he can show these things but in the end he cant defend himself from his actions.
If he signed a W4 and contributing to SS hes legally a second class "US citizen".
The W4 is signed under penalty of perjury proclaiming federal US citizenship.....he signed it as such.
They convicted Pete Hendrickson using this tactic...they used his signed W4 to prove he was making 26usc 3401(a) "wages. They didn't have to explain why or how other than his signature on the W4 convicting him.
Social Security is the number 1 tool that puts anyone using the number to gain federal benefits in their jurisdiction. Some here will argue with me on this but all government forms cannot be processed unless theres a ssn.

You cannot be in the same jurisdiction as "We the People" and still take benefits under the federal government (another jurisdiction). Theres many court cases citing this.
If he tries to prove hes not and accepting federal benefits hes in violation of the US Constitution. And I wouldn't put it past the DC goons on trying to hang him on that to end that argument once and for all if he wins the argument in court.
So he wins his case...that doesn't mean the definitions are wrong. A lot of other people fall within the meaning of those definitions. Most americans want their federal benefits and so the definitions stand as written.
Lets say he wins his case. What makes you think they wont arrest him for fraud. If you stand on your rights and the law you better know how to use the law to defend yourself.
They'll use his momentum to convict him. And from what I've seen so far he hasn't proven himself that he's not a "US citizen". All I see is he's playing a dangerous court game of semantics over silly definitions all while standing in the jurisdiction he claims hes not in.
NOT AN INTELLIGENT PERSON. He needs to open his eyes wider to see the legal noose he's made for himself and hope he doesn't put his head in.
Always stay a few steps ahead of the game.
His arguement is the US District courts are territorial courts, Article IV courts lacking Constitutional authority to take jurisdiction in the 50 geographical states. He has shown that to be the case. Congress has given these courts jurisdiction, general jurisdiction over federal crimes. The Congress lacks the Constitutional authority to grant jurisdiction in the union states. Congress lacks Constitutional authority to legislate in the union states. The Congress has usurped this power.

By the way, as far as intelligence, he was a National Merit Scholar. I rated in the 99th percentile in the USA on the National Merit Scholarship tests for 1960. That wasn't enough for me to qualify to be awarded a National Merit Scholarship. So he must have been near the 100th percentile to awarded the honor. That means 99 % of the high school seniors taking the National Merit Scholarship exams the year he graduated rated lower than he did.

Can you show us where, in the Constitution the US District courts have authority to take jurisdiction in any of the union states? I don't think you can and neither can these two federal judges.