Quote Originally Posted by Ares View Post
If it was true the court would of asserted jurisdiction. Reading through his previous documentation on his site he was able to show through court cases that just because he has a signed W-4 does not mean that he is a U.S. citizen (one who actually resides in DC.) He was also able to show that the U.S. District courts have zero jurisdiction in states with matters of debt.
Sure he can show these things but in the end he cant defend himself from his actions.
If he signed a W4 and contributing to SS hes legally a second class "US citizen".
The W4 is signed under penalty of perjury proclaiming federal US citizenship.....he signed it as such.
They convicted Pete Hendrickson using this tactic...they used his signed W4 to prove he was making 26usc 3401(a) "wages. They didn't have to explain why or how other than his signature on the W4 convicting him.
Social Security is the number 1 tool that puts anyone using the number to gain federal benefits in their jurisdiction. Some here will argue with me on this but all government forms cannot be processed unless theres a ssn.

You cannot be in the same jurisdiction as "We the People" and still take benefits under the federal government (another jurisdiction). Theres many court cases citing this.
If he tries to prove hes not and accepting federal benefits hes in violation of the US Constitution. And I wouldn't put it past the DC goons on trying to hang him on that to end that argument once and for all if he wins the argument in court.
So he wins his case...that doesn't mean the definitions are wrong. A lot of other people fall within the meaning of those definitions. Most americans want their federal benefits and so the definitions stand as written.
Lets say he wins his case. What makes you think they wont arrest him for fraud. If you stand on your rights and the law you better know how to use the law to defend yourself.
They'll use his momentum to convict him. And from what I've seen so far he hasn't proven himself that he's not a "US citizen". All I see is he's playing a dangerous court game of semantics over silly definitions all while standing in the jurisdiction he claims hes not in. In the end the definitions will not change anyway because theres people who cannot be anything else but "US citizens" and will remain in such jurisdiction under the definitions because they are "federal personnel" residing within one the 50 states which the federal government has every right to reach in and control....namely the negro. They are not to this day recognized as "We the People"...they are "US citizens" and cannot go any higher.
This is why the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 because they don't have the protections of the "Bill of Rights".
NOT AN INTELLIGENT PERSON. He needs to open his eyes wider to see the legal noose he's made for himself and hope he doesn't put his head in.
Always stay a few steps ahead of the game.
First of all......understand the game before making a move and that is what he hasn't figured out yet.