Quote Originally Posted by monty View Post
Likewise. I have a gut feeling he has them by the balls.
No he doesnt....its his ignorance of "HIS" voluntary actions that'll make him lose the case.

He volunteered his political presence into that particular jurisdiction venue. The definitions mean nothing in that sense. Besides the definitions define perfectly what he volunteered himself into.
He's playing semantics with the court like most people do who dont know what they are doing.
I bet none of you understand why they changed the definitions around the 1868 are..................has everything to do with the Civil War and who was free'd but wasn't accepted as "We the People" by none of the union states including the northern states.

They'll just pull the "ignorance of the law is no excuse" card..........and it is true.